The
pro-life position supports a criminalization approach that depends on a racist
political system that will necessarily impact poor women and women of color who
are less likely to have alternative strategies for addressing unwanted
pregnancies. Meanwhile, the pro-choice position often supports population
control policies and the development of dangerous contraceptives that are
generally targeted toward communities of color. And both positions do not
question the capitalist system – they focus solely on the decision of whether
or not a woman should have an abortion without addressing the economic,
political, and social conditions that put women in this position in the first
place (2009, p. 454).
I was
struck by the author’s verbiage: “dangerous contraceptives.” In response,
Planned Parenthood reported in 2000:
At the dawn of a new century and new
millennium:
- Ninety-eight percent of American
women use birth control at some point in their lives.
- Eighty-nine percent of Americans
favor more access to information about birth control.
- Eighty-one percent think birth
control access is a good way to prevent abortions. (2010).
I can
hardly understand how a population of women in favor of more access to birth
control, and open to new forms of birth control, should be concerned about
dangerous contraceptives. In general,
I really agree with Smith’s main point: we need a new model to encompass an
enlightened society’s intersectional perspectives on the issue of abortion. Speaking
to Smith’s report on the avoidance of questioning the capitalist system, I ask
why we would need to question something that cannot and will not be affectively
changed? Of course we must consider the environment of the individuals of our
society in every way. Kavanaugh finds:
Clearly,
this is an issue that I could research and cite and expound on for days on end.
I do firmly believe, however, that the more we know, the closer we come to a
middle ground. I do not personally see the issue of abortion as a yin and yang.
Instead, like Smith notes, “both [sides of the abortion debate] depend on
similar operating assumptions that do nothing to support either life or real
choice for women of color” (2009, p. 447). This is certainly a tentacle of the
abortion octopus that we can do something about.
References
Kavanaugh,
J. (2004). The values vote. America,
191 (17), 7.Planned Parenthood (2010). History and successes. General format. Retrieved from http://www.plannedparenthood.org/about-us/who-we-are/history-and-successes.htm
Smith, A. (2009). Beyond pro-choice versus pro-life: Women of color and reproductive justice. In V. Taylor, N. Whittier & L. Rupp (Eds.) Feminist Frontiers (pp.389-399). New York, NY: McGraw Hill, p. 446-457.
No comments:
Post a Comment